Utah woman might have to register as sex offender after kids see her topless at home

SALT LAKE CITY – A judge is considering whether to strike down a portion of Utah's lewdness statute dealing with topless women.

Tilli Buchanan is facing three misdemeanor charges of lewdness involving a child stemming from an incident in her home.

The West Valley City woman was doing insulation work with her husband and they were stripping off itchy clothing when her stepchildren saw her. That ultimately led to the criminal charges being leveled against her earlier this year. Buchanan's attorney argues she did nothing wrong.

"If we are to lose this, she’s on the sex registry with child rapists and things of that nature. The magnitude of the penalty on this is enormous," Buchanan's attorney, Randy Richards told KSTU.

On Tuesday, her attorney and the ACLU of Utah asked for the case to be dismissed and a portion of Utah's lewdness statute to be struck down citing a recent ruling by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that found anti-topless laws discriminated against women.

Buchanan left court saying she felt "hopeful" that Judge Kara Pettit would side with her.

"Especially with, given it was in the privacy of my own home, my husband was right next to me, in the exact same manner that I was and he’s not being prosecuted," she told reporters.

The ACLU of Utah has also intervened in the case on Buchanan's behalf. In court on Tuesday, ACLU staff attorney Leah Farrell argued that a particular portion of Utah's lewdness statute discriminates against women.

"There’s part of it that says this part of a woman is found inherently obscene and this part of a man isn’t," she told reporters outside court. "That really sets up an unequal and unfair dichotomy. And Tilli’s case is something none of us would expect to happen."

The ACLU cited the "Free the Nipple" ruling that found anti-topless ordinances violated the 14th Amendment right of equal protection under the law. The ruling, which generated headlines nationwide, has slowly started to be utilized in Utah. Attorneys with clients facing lewdness charges are citing it. KSTU recently documented a group of women in St. George who went topless and faced no criminal repercussions from local authorities.

West Valley City prosecutors argued to the judge that the "Free the Nipple" ruling was much more narrow than the ACLU would like it to be. They also insisted that the legislature has a right to make laws based on a morality.

"We see our job is to represent the laws of the state of Utah and we’ve made our argument that’s now on the record," chief West Valley City prosecutor Ryan Robinson told reporters as they left court. "We’re looking forward to seeing what the judge decides."

Judge Pettit said she expected to issue a ruling within a couple of months.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

8 comments

    • Yeaps

      They were stepchildren, so they probably told their other parents during their next visitation or whatever and of course they used it as fuel for more post divorce drama.

    • Yeaps

      Wouldn’t the “crybabies” be the sexist conservatives who apparently get offended at the very thought of women being topless? Clearly the crybabies here are not the liberals defending “free the nipple”, it’s the snowflake republicans triggered by it.

      • Focks17 gone to nipples

        Nipples rule. It is kind of a “common sense” thing. She’s in her home. Not being a perv. This should be a non issue.

  • AC

    How ridiculous! She and her husband stripped their “itchy” clothing. It wasn’t done in a sexual manner. The father “stripped” too, yet no charges. If she bared her nipple to breastfeed, would that be a crime? I’m in Michigan and my neighbor was convicted of 4th degree CSC and with his plea deal, he did 6 months in jail and doesn’t have to register as a sex offender. He violated boys age 13-15, and he’s over 50. SMH!!!

  • Kevin Rahe

    This seems like one of those exceptions that shouldn’t be prosecuted. While the woman might have been able to find a more private place to undress, I don’t see it as much different than an older child catching sight of a breast while mom is breastfeeding a baby, at least as far as the law is concerned.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.